Tuesday, June 14, 2011

2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan

images 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier LS Classified Ad - Barrie Sedans For Sale 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls
  • 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls



  • gc_kaavaali
    11-14 04:31 PM
    It is upto you...you can intimate them for job changes...or wait for USCIS come back to you...they usually send you RFE...if you want details about how to intimate USCIS, please take a look at below link...somebody got GC after invoking AC21...so it is upto you. As far as job description...your labor has good details...it covers everything...I think u r fine...you can go ahead and join compnay....but i am not an attorney...contact your attorney...

    http://boards.immigration.com/showthread.php?t=153407


    I have same question......if for example as above someone changes to SAP....what should be done in terms of notification to USCIS..?

    Do we just go ahead and join the new job / consulting firm and get a letter from them to match the O*NET code or description as above...?





    wallpaper 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier LS
  • 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier LS



  • Jerrome
    05-21 04:11 PM
    I have received RFE for my spouse, I have not received the details yet, but need to clarify the following(i am in touch with my attorney also).

    We applied for her H1 in 2007 April, it got approved on September 2007.

    We also applied 485 in July 2007 so she did not join the H1b Company on September 2007.

    We applied COS to H4 on February 2008 but she started working on EAD from March 2008 onwards, she is still working on EAD.

    Her H4 approved on November 2008(but i was no more in H1).

    I think my wife's status is AOS from July 2007 onwards is that correct? Or is this a problem?





    2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier LS
  • 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier LS



  • dollar500
    11-19 05:48 PM
    I had a strange situation. I checked on the case status site to see if there is any update on my case. I am a July 2 filer with EAD plus FP. The earlier update date was 9/2/2007. I checked there it says that it's updated as 11/1/2007, when I reread it I didn't notice anything different. Can anybody shed some light?

    Application Type: I485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS

    Current Status: Case received and pending.

    On September 1, 2007, we received this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS, and mailed you a notice describing how we will process your case. Please follow any instructions on this notice. We will notify you by mail when we make a decision or if we need something from you. If you move while this case is pending, call customer service. We process cases in the order we receive them. You can use our processing dates to estimate when yours will be done. This case is at our NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER location. Follow the link below to check processing dates. You can also receive automatic e-mail updates as we process your case. Just follow the link below to register.





    2011 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier LS 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. Chevrolet Cavalier LS Sport
  • Chevrolet Cavalier LS Sport



  • rb_248
    08-02 02:59 PM
    I use my pigeon for delivery. It reaches on time every time.



    more...


    2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier LS
  • 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier LS



  • newuser
    02-11 08:16 PM
    Petition signed





    2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier Base
  • 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier Base



  • go_guy123
    08-24 04:52 PM
    ILW.COM - immigration news: Ninth Circuit In Herrera v. <em>USCIS</em> Rules That Revocation Of I-140 Petition Trumps Portability (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2009,0825-mehta.shtm)

    Ninth Circuit In Herrera v. USCIS Rules That Revocation Of I-140 Petition Trumps Portability
    by Cyrus D. Mehta

    As the Employment-based categories remain hopeless backlogged,1 especially for those born in India and China in the Employment-based Second Preference (EB-2) and for the entire world in the Employment-Based Third Preference (EB-3),2 the only silver lining is the ability of the applicant to exercise portability under INA � 204(j).

    Under INA � 204(j), an I-140 petition3 remains valid even if the alien has changed employers or jobs so long as an application for adjustment of status has been filed and remains unadjudicated for 180 days or more and that the applicant has changed jobs or employers in the same or similar occupational classification as the job for which the petition was filed.

    Stated simply, an applicant for adjustment of status (Form I-485) can move to a new employer or change positions with the same employer who filed the I-140 petition as long as the new position is in a same or similar occupation as the original position.4 This individual who has changed jobs can still continue to enjoy the benefits of the I-485 application and the ability to obtain permanent residency. � 204(j), thus, allows one not to be imprisoned with an employer or in one position if an adjustment application is pending for more than 180 days. A delay of more than 180 days may be caused either due to inefficiency with United States Immigration and Citizenship Services (�USCIS�), or more recently, due the retrogression in visa numbers in the EB-2 and EB-3 categories.

    A recent decision from the Ninth Circuit, Herrera v. USCIS, No. 08-55493, 2009 WL 1911596 (C.A. 9 (Cal.)), 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14592,5 unfortunately, may render adjustment applicants who have exercised portability under INA � 204(j) more vulnerable.

    In Herrera v. USCIS, the petitioner in this case, Herrera, was the beneficiary of an approved I-140 petition, which was filed under INA � 203(b)(1)(C) as an alien who seeks to work for a company �in the capacity that is managerial or executive.�6 At Herrera�s adjustment of status interview, the examining officer discovered that she was not truly employed in a managerial or executive capacity for the petitioning employer. The employer who filed the I-140 petition, Jugendstil, did not manufacture furniture, as it stated in the I-140 petition, but rather, engaged in interior designing services. Following the adjustment interview, and long after the adjustment application was pending for more than 180 days, Herrera exercised portability to a new employer. Unfortunately, a few months after she had exercised portability, the California Service Center (�CSC�) issued a notice of intent to revoke Herrera�s previously approved I-140 petition. This notice, which was sent to the prior employer that filed the I-140 petition, alleged that Herrera did not work in a managerial or executive capacity due to the size of the petitioning entity ( which had only 7 employees) and also because of her lack of managerial or executive job duties, which included visits to client sites. The CSC ultimately revoked the I-140 petition after giving Jugendstil an opportunity to respond. This indeed is anomalous, since the original I-140 petitioner, after the alien has exercised portability, may not have an incentive to respond. However, in this case, Jugendstil did appear to have an incentive to respond (and litigate the matter) as Herrera had �ported� to Bay Area Bumpers, an affiliate of Jugendstil. The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) affirmed the denial, and so did the federal district court.

    At issue in Herrera v. USCIS was whether the government�s authority to revoke an I-140 petition under INA � 205 survived portability under INA � 204(j). INA � 205 states, �The Secretary of Homeland Security may, at any time, for what he deems to be good and sufficient cause, revoke the approval of any petition approved by him under section 204. Such revocation shall be effective as of the date of approval of any such petition.�

    The Ninth Circuit agreed with the government that it continued to have the power to revoke a petition under INA � 205 even though the alien may have successfully exercised portability under INA � 204(j). The Ninth Circuit reasoned that in order to �remain valid� under INA � 204(j), the I-140 petition must have been valid from the start. If a petition should never have been approved, the petitioner was not and had never been valid. The Ninth Circuit also cited with approval an AAO decision, which previously held in 2005 that a petition that is deniable, or not approvable, will not be considered valid for purposes under INA � 204(j).7 Finally, the Ninth Circuit reasoned that if Herrera�s argument prevailed, it would have unintended practical consequences, which Congress never intended. For instance, an alien who exercised portability, such as Herrera, would be immune to revocation, but an alien who remained with the petitioning employer would not be able to be so immune. If the opposite were true, according to the Ninth Circuit, an applicant would have a huge incentive to change jobs in order to escape the revocation of an I-140 petition. Finally, the Ninth Circuit also examined the merits of the revocation, and held that the AAO�s decision was supported by substantial evidence.8

    Based on the holding in Herrera v. USCIS, adjustment applicants who have exercised portability better beware in the event that the USCIS later decides to revoke your I-140 petition. 8 CFR � 205.2 (a), which implements INA � 205, gives authority to any Service officer to revoke a petition �when the necessity of revocation comes to the attention of the Service.� Also, under 8 CFR � 205.2(b), the Service needs to only give notice to the petitioner of the revocation and an opportunity to rebut. An adjustment applicant who has exercised portability may not be so fortunate to have a petitioner who may be interested in responding to the notice of revocation, leave alone informing this individual who may no longer be within his or her prior employer�s orbit.

    Finally, of most concern, is whether every revocation dooms the adjustment applicant who has �ported� under INA � 204(j). Not all revocations are caused by the fact that the petition may have not been valid from the very outset. For instance, under the automatic revocation provisions in 8 CFR � 205.1(a)(3)(iii), an I-140 petition may be automatically revoked �[u]pon written notice of withdrawal filed by the petitioner, in employment-based preference cases, with any officer of the Service who is authorized to grant or deny petitions.� An employer may routinely, out of abundant caution, decide to inform the USCIS if its employee leaves, even though he or she may legitimately assert portability as a pending adjustment applicant. Such a revocation of the I-140 ought to be distinguished from Herrera v. USCIS as the I-140 was valid from its inception but for the fact that the employer initiated the withdrawal. Similarly, another ground for automatic termination is upon the termination of the employer�s business.9 It would not make sense to deny someone portability if the petitioning entity, which previously sponsored him or her, went out of business, but was viable at the time it had sponsored the alien. Indeed, one Q&A in the Aytes Memo, supra, at least addresses the issue of an employer�s withdrawal:10

    �Question 11. When is an I-140 no longer valid for porting purposes?�

    Answer: An I-140 petition is no longer valid for porting purposes when:

    1. an I-140 is withdrawn before the alien�s I-485 has been pending 180 days, or
    2. an I-140 is denied or revoked at any time except when it is revoked based on a withdrawal that was submitted after an I-485 has been pending for 180 days.�

    It is hoped that Herrera v. USCIS, a classic instance of bad facts making bad law, does not affect those whose petitions have been revoked after the original employer submitted a withdrawal after an I-485 application was pending for more than 180 days. The Aytes Memo makes clear that this should not be the case. Less clear is whether a revocation caused by the termination of the employer�s business should have an impact on an adjustment applicant�s ability to exercise portability.11 The Aytes Memo seems to suggest that such a person who has exercised portability may be jeopardized if the I-140 petition is revoked. It is one thing to deny portability to someone whose I-140 petition was never valid, although hopefully the individual who has ported ought to be given the ability to challenge the revocation in addition to the original petitioner.12 On the other hand, there is absolutely no justification to deny portability when revocation of an I-140 petition occurs upon the business terminating, after it had been viable when the I-140 was filed and approved, or when the employer submits a notice of withdrawal of the I-140 petition after the I-485 has been pending for more than 180 days.



    more...


    2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. Chevrolet Cavalier LS 4D Sedan
  • Chevrolet Cavalier LS 4D Sedan



  • gbof
    06-30 01:49 PM
    so far, I have heard about at least 30 cases over the internet including one personal case (my wife's) and all of the cancelled appointments seem to be either on 7th, 8th or 9th july. (My wife had it on 8th and got a cancellation notice with the same date which was delivered yesterday...)

    From forums, it appears that, a few of them already got their rescheduled notices, and some got the new date after calling... either way, I guess the above info seems to be true..... worst case scenario, if you don't get rescheduled notices (or dates by calling) by your appointment date, just go to the ASC. I know it's a pain... but I just don't want to give them a chance at denying and don't want to go thru all that hassle...

    pal :)

    I am so very ready for FP on 7/6 and now reading these cancellations is very irritating. To show up definitely require some-bit of planning. Why should they send notice at first placeand then cancel en-block. I only wish I donot get this cancellation notice before 6th and it goes on as scheduled.





    2010 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier LS 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier LS Classified Ad - Barrie Sedans For Sale
  • 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier LS Classified Ad - Barrie Sedans For Sale



  • belmontboy
    02-11 02:42 PM
    Hi Folks,

    What is the fastest and perhaps a little economic way to get documents over to chennai (Tamil Nadu) or Calicut (Kerala) from here in San Jose, ca.

    USPS has this service called Express Mail ($27.95) or Priority Mail ($12.95)
    I guess USPS is claiming 6-10 days (guess no gurantee) to india.

    Other couriers seems to be $70+ (FedEx, UPS, DHL)..

    Anyone has had good luck with USPS ? or do you suggest the couriers mentioned above ?

    Need to get docs for an interview for parents on Feb 26th in Chennai...

    Thanks in Advance for your reply !!

    DHL. Costs 45$ flat rate. Take about 3 working days



    more...


    2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier LS Classified Ad - Barrie Sedans For Sale
  • 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier LS Classified Ad - Barrie Sedans For Sale



  • bsbawa10
    01-23 06:17 PM
    Since Ombudsman invited these. Here is a very big list of them.

    1. Transparency: USCIS never releases how many eb1 or eb2 cases are pending so things are so unpredictable, no body can expect the time frame at all.

    2. Respect priority dates: There is no logic what so ever in giving green cards to people having priority dates 2006 when the cases with priority dates 2003, 2004 are all pending. Why is priority date even there then ?

    3. Email support and some real customer service: Currently customer service is just getting their pay stubs. They just speak whatever is on the website and have no power at all. Why does this type of customer support even have to be their from the tax payers money.

    4. Update the cases on the website: Often the cases on the USCIS are not updated and people can bang their heads trying to guess what is happening and customer service is as has been described. For eg. my case shows that my I485 case is in California service center whereas I know that it is in Texas Service Center. I have run from piller to post to get it changed including calling customer service many many times, writing letters to Texas Service center, calling Californa service center and Texas Service Center but to no use at all. Atlast I gave up.

    5. Automatic Advance Parole and EAD: Why does USCIS try to increase load for itself ? Is it for making more money or is it to claim that they have a lot of load and then say that they are understaffed? Why not the very fact that I485 is pending should give permission for work as well as permission to reenter the country ?

    Thanks.





    hair Chevrolet Cavalier LS Sport 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls
  • 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls



  • mohitb272
    12-11 03:11 PM
    one way i am thinking of doing is asking for a EVL from the new company with the same kind of job description. 10 years ago, all these laws (to be in the same job description was having some meaning , people used to get GCs in less than a year), but these days it takes anywhere between 5-7 years, and how can uscis expect someone to be in the same description working for 7 years. it just doesnt make sense when you want to be competitive in the market.

    Cannot agree with you more! USCIS - is any one listening???



    more...


    2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier LS
  • 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier LS



  • Caliber
    05-03 11:56 AM
    One thing they can agree on is covering their own a**.

    i4u, Please think back if this is the language we use on Lawmakers of this great country.





    hot 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier LS 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls
  • 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls



  • joeshmoe
    09-04 07:05 PM
    What was the Approval date on your I140?

    06 Oct 2006



    more...


    house 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Sedan 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier Sedan
  • 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier Sedan



  • priya82
    02-17 09:06 PM
    Thanks a lot snathan.

    emploer A is still holding my H1b, they did not revoke it.

    employer A(American Company) has offered me a job and asked me to start from Monday(02/23) but employer B(Indian Company) has applied for
    H1b transfer.

    The only thing I am worried, if there is another layoff with employer A before H1B transfer with employer B. In that situation can I join employer B and maintain my status.

    please help me.





    tattoo 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier Base 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier LS
  • 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier LS



  • rajuseattle
    08-30 01:42 AM
    R u working for a desi bodyshop who may have been on the blacklist of USCIS?

    Usually for I-485 stage USCIS looks for last 5 yrs of employment an the latest I-94 and TAX return for past 3 yrs.

    Who filed your I-485, if its attorney then he may not have provided the required evidence for your current immigration status.

    Whats your I-140 status?



    more...


    pictures Chevrolet Cavalier LS 4D Sedan 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier LS
  • 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier LS



  • kaisersose
    07-31 06:00 PM
    The Family GC option is only available to unmarried children. Now I do not know how this applies to your mother, but even if she can change her status to something else, it may impact your status assuming you are in the US now.

    Anyway, it appears we have hardly any details of your case. Best to consult an attorney.





    dresses 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls
  • 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls



  • Waitingnvain
    02-08 10:01 AM
    I will be in transit through Amsterdam, do I need a transit visa and are there any problems with travelling on Advance Parole.

    Thanks



    more...


    makeup 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier LS Classified Ad - Barrie Sedans For Sale 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Sedan
  • 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Sedan



  • chanduv23
    05-13 12:35 PM
    Looks like - they keep pulling up your information using your A number and for some reason they may be relating to your EB2 i 140 even though you have an EB3 i 140.

    We have no clue what happens inside USCIS and how their record retention policy is.

    You must do the following

    (1) Write to Ombudsman - fill out form 7001 and attach all documents, proofs, and clearly explain the issue and hardships you are facing

    (2) Write to both your Senators

    (3) Write to your congressman

    (4) Write to IV also in detail about your case. Don't have to write any private details.





    girlfriend 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier LS 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Base
  • 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Base



  • memyselfandus
    07-21 10:45 PM
    Hi,

    I had applied for H1 for 2008 from two different employers.Both got approved.Now my concern is ,
    1)would there be any problem during the Visa stamping?
    2)What should i do to other visa ,which i will be not using?
    3)How should i approach the employer whose employment i will be not accepting?
    4)I have signed one offer letter from the employer but other employer had not provided me with the offer leter.so whom should i join?


    Just pick the one that you to want join with. It doesn't matter if you got more than one application approved. The effective H1B will be the one that you would use for stamping at embassy.

    Hence relax and have fun!!





    hairstyles 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier LS 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Ls Sedan. 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier LS
  • 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier LS



  • mayurcreation
    04-18 08:05 AM
    TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

    This is to certify that Mr. XXX was full time employed with CompanyName from date to date as a Sr. Programmer Analyst.

    During his tenure with us, he skillfully handled major responsibilities and found him to be hardworking and very productive.

    Mr. XXX job duties and responsibilities include but are not limited to:
    � Job duties and responsibilities from resume�
    � Job duties and responsibilities from resume�
    � Job duties and responsibilities from resume�
    � Job duties and responsibilities from resume�
    � Job duties and responsibilities from resume�

    Please feel free to contact me for further information.

    Sincerely,

    {Name}
    {Title}





    singhsa3
    08-14 11:02 PM
    This will be mass distributed with the flyers.





    gcpool
    08-30 09:16 AM
    Advance parol was not taken and can we still use parole as a status.

    Unknown is good but I was wondering if it would raise any red flags



    No comments:

    Post a Comment